|
Business processes In the realm of customer service, representatives could use and provide timely, accurate responses. Marketers, on the other hand, might exploit Bard’s data analytics to pinpoint consumer trends and optimize campaigns. Product developers could engage Bard to collate feedback across various platforms, ensuring user needs are centrally addressed in design iterations. Risks of using Google Bard and similar models Potential biases The algorithms that power these AIs are trained on vast datasets collected from the internet.
If these datasets have biases, the DB to Data AI could inadvertently perpetuate those biases. For instance, if Google Bard was trained predominantly on data from one demographic, its responses might unwittingly reflect that group’s perspective, potentially marginalizing other perspectives. Uncertainties in accuracy No AI is infallible. There could be times when Bard provides information that is inaccurate or outdated. For example, if a student relies on Bard for historical data, there might be a risk of the AI offering a skewed or outdated interpretation of events.
Alternatives to Google Bard and ChatGPT Microsoft’s Turing-NLG: Aimed at businesses and developers, Microsoft’s Turing-NLG is designed to generate language for various applications, such as answering user queries, creating dynamic conversational agents and more. Its robust framework and extensive support make it suitable for a range of professional needs. IBM Watson: IBM’s Watson offers a suite of AI-powered products, including chatbot solutions tailored for customer service. Its deep learning and robust analytics capabilities make it a preferred choice for businesses looking to enhance customer engagement through intelligent interactions.
|
|